Superchrom Home Page

Contact

Request your quote


Optimized Volatiles Analysis Ensures Fast VOC Separations

By Michelle Misselwitz, Innovations Chemist, Gary Stidsen, Product Manager, and Chris English, Innovations Manager
Optimized conditions assure good resolution with minimal downtime.

Optimized methods for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be time-consuming to develop because compound lists can be extensive and analytes vary significantly in chemical characteristics. For example, target compounds in EPA Method 8260 for solid waste matrices include volatiles that range from light gases (Freon®) to larger aromatic compounds (trichlorobenzenes). These differences make column selectivity, thermal stability, and inertness critical to resolving volatiles. Often, “624” type columns are chosen for their selectivity, but thermal stability is usually poor, which can result in phase bleed that decreases detector sensitivity. New Rxi®-624Sil MS columns offer reliable resolution of critical VOC pairs and also provide lower bleed and greater inertness than other columns. In order to provide optimized conditions for labs analyzing VOCs, we established parameters that ensure good resolution, while reducing downtime by syncing purge and trap cycles with instrument cycles. In addition, we present comparative data that demonstrate why Rxi®-624Sil MS columns are the best choice for volatiles analysis.

Resolve Critical Pairs and Reduce Downtime

In order to achieve desired separations and minimize downtime between injections, several critical pairs were chosen for computational modeling using Pro ezGC software. The temperature program initially determined by the software was 35 °C (hold 5 min.) to 120 °C @ 11 °C/min. to 220°C @ 20 °C/min. (hold 2 min.). While this provided the best resolution of critical pairs, it also extended the analysis time to 19 min. Since the purge and trap cycle time was 16.5 min., we tested other conditions to see if adequate resolution could be maintained, while using a faster instrument cycle time that more closely matched the purge and trap cycle time, in order to maximize sample throughput. In other calculations, the software suggested changing temperature ramps at 60°C; therefore, a program of 35°C (hold 5 min.) to 60°C @ 11 °C/min. to 220°C @ 20 °C/min. (hold 2 min.) was tested. This final program reduced instrument downtime by better synchronizing injection and analysis cycles, and also provided excellent resolution of volatile compounds (Figure 1). Testing of faster conditions determined that the initial hold of 5 minutes at 35°C was critical for the best separation of early eluting compounds, such as the gases, as well as a favorable elution of methanol between gas compounds.

Figure 1: Rxi®-624Sil MS columns resolve methyl ethyl ketone and ethyl acetate, a separation not obtained on other 624 columns.
Peaks RT (min.)
1. Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) 2.198
2. Chloromethane 2.459
3. Vinyl chloride 2.659
4. Bromomethane 3.226
5. Chloroethane 3.434
6. Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) 3.876
7. Diethyl ether (ethyl ether) 4.44
8. 1,1-Dichloroethene 4.909
9. 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113) 4.998
10. Acetone 5.029
11. Iodomethane 5.195
12. Carbon disulfide 5.323
13. Acetonitrile 5.637
14. Allyl chloride 5.715
15. Methyl acetate 5.723
16. Methylene chloride 5.981
17. tert-Butyl alcohol 6.234
18. Acrylonitrile 6.451
19. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 6.509
20. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6.512
21. 1,1-Dichloroethane 7.315
22. Vinyl acetate 7.359
23. Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) 7.407
24. Chloroprene 7.429
25. Ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) 7.97
26. 2-Butanone (MEK) 8.193
27. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8.193
28. 2,2-Dichloropropane 8.193
29. Ethyl acetate 8.265
30. Propionitrile 8.276
31. Methyl acrylate 8.318
32. Methacrylonitrile 8.476
33. Bromochloromethane 8.507
34. Tetrahydrofuran 8.521
35. Chloroform 8.651
36. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8.843
37. Dibromofluoromethane 8.848
38. Carbon tetrachloride 9.026
39. 1,1-Dichloropropene 9.037
40. 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 9.246
41. Benzene 9.262
42. 1,2-Dichloroethane 9.334
43. Isopropyl acetate 9.34
44. Isobutyl alcohol 9.421
45. tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME) 9.421
46. Fluorobenzene 9.598
47. Trichloroethene 9.976
48. 1,2-Dichloropropane 10.243
49. Methyl methacrylate 10.29
50. 1,4-Dioxane (ND) 10.299*
51. Dibromomethane 10.326
52. Propyl acetate 10.346
Peaks RT (min.)
53. 2-Chloroethanol (ND) 10.368*
54. Bromodichloromethane 10.496
55. 2-Nitropropane 10.698
56. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.904
57. 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11.026
58. Toluene-D8 11.148
59. Toluene 11.21
60. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11.407
61. Ethyl methacrylate 11.435
62. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11.585
63. Tetrachloroethene 11.662
64. 1,3-Dichloropropane 11.729
65. 2-Hexanone 11.749
66. Butyl acetate 11.837
67. Dibromochloromethane 11.921
68. 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 12.035
69. Chlorobenzene-d5 12.412
70. Chlorobenzene 12.44
71. Ethylbenzene 12.507
72. 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 12.507
73. m-Xylene 12.612
74. p-Xylene 12.612
75. o-Xylene 12.935
76. Styrene 12.949
77. n-Amyl acetate 13.018
78. Bromoform 13.118
79. Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 13.226
80. cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 13.268
81. 4-Bromofluorobenzene 13.385
82. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 13.456
83. trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 13.496
84. Bromobenzene 13.515
85. 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 13.526
86. n-Propylbenzene 13.565
87. 2-Chlorotoluene 13.657
88. 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 13.699
89. 4-Chlorotoluene 13.751
90. tert-Butylbenzene 13.965
91. Pentachloroethane 14.007
92. 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 14.01
93. sec-Butylbenzene 14.14
94. 4-Isopropyltoluene (p-cymene) 14.254
95. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 14.263
96. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-D4 14.321
97. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 14.34
98. n-Butylbenzene 14.579
99. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 14.635
100. 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) 15.252
101. Nitrobenzene 15.407
102. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 15.935
103. Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 16.04
104. Naphthalene 16.196
105. 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 16.396
* ND = not detected; retention time determined by wet needle injection
Column Rxi®-624Sil MS, 30 m, 0.25 mm ID, 1.40 µm (cat.# 13868)
Sample 8260A Surrogate Mix (cat.# 30240)
8260A Internal Standard Mix (cat.# 30241)
8260B MegaMix® Calibration Mix (cat.# 30633)
VOA Calibration Mix #1 (ketones) (cat.# 30006)
8260B Acetate Mix (Revised) (cat.# 30489)
California Oxygenates Mix (cat.# 30465)
502.2 Calibration Mix #1 (gases) (cat.# 30042)
Conc.: 25 ppb in RO water
Injection purge and trap split (split ratio 30:1)
Inj. Temp.: 225 °C
Purge and Trap
Instrument: OI Analytical 4660
Trap Type: 10 Trap
Purge: 11 min. @ 20 °C
Desorb Preheat Temp.: 180 °C
Desorb: 0.5 min. @ 190 °C
Bake: 5 min. @ 210 °C
Interface Connection: injection port
Oven
Oven Temp: 35 °C (hold 5 min.) to 60 °C at 11 °C/min. to 220 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 2 min.)
Carrier Gas He, constant flow
Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Detector MS
Mode: Scan
Transfer Line Temp.: 230 °C
Analyzer Type: Quadrupole
Source Temp.: 230 °C
Quad Temp.: 150 °C
Electron Energy: 70 eV
Solvent Delay Time: 1.5 min.
Tune Type: BFB
Ionization Mode: EI
Scan Range: 36-260 amu
Instrument Agilent 7890A GC & 5975C MSD
Notes Other Purge and Trap Conditions:
Sample Inlet: 40°C
Sample: 40°C
Water Management: Purge 110°C, Desorb 0°C, Bake, 240°C
GC_PH1169

Not all “624s” are Equivalent

While optimizing instrument conditions can improve sample throughput, obtaining adequate resolution depends largely on column selectivity, thermal stability, and inertness. Rxi®-624Sil MS columns are optimized across these parameters, and therefore provide reliable separation of critical VOCs.

Lower Bleed Means Improved Sensitivity and Longer Column Lifetime

While 624 type columns generally provide good selectivity for most volatiles, they are limited by their low thermal stability. Poor thermal stability results in phase bleed that can reduce column lifetime, decrease detector sensitivity (especially ion trap mass spectrometers), and interfere with the quantification of later eluting compounds. Rxi®-624Sil MS columns have the highest thermal stability and lowest bleed among 624 type columns due to the incorporation of phenyl rings in the polymer backbone (Table I, Figure 2). The conjugated ring system of this silarylene phase provides a more rigid structure that increases thermal stability compared to nonsilarylene phases.

Table 1: The Rxi®-624Sil MS column has the highest thermal stability of any 624 column.
Column Manufacturer Highest Temperature Limit (Isothermal)
Rxi-624Sil MS Restek 320 ºC
VF-624ms Varian 300 ºC
DB-624 Agilent J&W 260 ºC
ZB-624 Phenomenex 260 ºC

Figure 2: The Rxi®-624Sil MS column has the lowest bleed of any column in its class and provides true GC/MS capability.
Peaks
1. Fluorobenzene
Column Rxi®-624Sil MS (see notes), 30 m, 0.25 mm ID, 1.4 µm (cat.# 13868)
Sample Fluorobenzene (cat.# 30030)
Diluent: methanol
Conc.: 200 µg/mL
Injection
Inj. Vol.: 1 µL split (split ratio 20:1)
Liner: 4mm Split Liner with Wool (cat.# 20781)
Inj. Temp.: 220 °C
Oven
Oven Temp: 40 °C (hold 5 min.) to 60 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 5 min.) to 120 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 5 min.) to 200 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 10 min.) to 260 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 10 min.) to 300 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 20 min.)
Carrier Gas He, constant flow
Linear Velocity: 40 cm/sec.
Detector FID @ 250 °C
Instrument Agilent/HP6890 GC
Notes Columns are of equivalent dimensions and were tested after equivalent conditioning.

GC_GN1147

Better Peak Shape Means More Accurate Results

Rxi®-624Sil MS columns are the most inert 624 column available. Figure 3 shows the differences between vendor columns using primary amines, which are good indicators of column activity. The unique Rxi® deactivation results in symmetric peaks with minimal tailing, which improves quantitative accuracy. Minimizing tailing is especially important with concentration techniques, such as purge and trap, since the act of desorbing analytes off of the packing material results in some tailing. If a column is not inert, additional tailing due to column activity can magnify this problem. The sharp, symmetric peaks seen on Rxi®-624Sil MS columns allow greater resolution, higher signal-to-noise ratios, and more accurate results for active volatiles such as alcohols (Figure 4).

Figure 3: Highly inert Rxi®-624Sil MS columns provide better peak shape and more accurate results for active compounds.
Peaks
1. Isopropylamine
2. Diethylamine
3. Triethylamine
Column Rxi®-624Sil MS, 30 m, 0.32 mm ID, 1.8 µm (cat.# 13870)
Sample
Diluent: DMSO
Conc.: 100 µg/mL each compound
Injection
Inj. Vol.: 1 µL split (split ratio 20:1)
Liner: 5mm Single Gooseneck with Wool (cat.# 22973-200.1)
Inj. Temp.: 250 °C
Oven
Oven Temp: 50 °C (hold 1 min.) to 200 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 5 min.)
Carrier Gas He, constant flow
Linear Velocity: 37 cm/sec.
Detector FID @ 250 °C
Instrument Agilent/HP6890 GC


GC_PH1162
Figure 4: Obtain more accurate results for active volatiles, such as alcohols, by using highly inert Rxi®-624Sil MS columns.
Peaks
1. tert-Butyl Alcohol
Column Rxi®-624Sil MS, 30 m, 0.25 mm ID, 1.40 µm (cat.# 13868)
Sample
Conc.: 25 ppb in RO water
Injection purge and trap split (split ratio 30:1)
Inj. Temp.: 225 °C
Purge and Trap
Instrument: OI Analytical 4660
Trap Type: 10 Trap
Purge: 11 min. @ 20 °C
Desorb Preheat Temp.: 180 °C
Desorb: 0.5 min. @ 190 °C
Bake: 5 min. @ 210 °C
Interface Connection: injection port
Oven
Oven Temp: 35 °C (hold 5 min.) to 60 °C at 11 °C/min. to 220 °C at 20 °C/min. (hold 2 min.)
Carrier Gas He, constant flow
Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Detector MS
Mode: Scan
Transfer Line Temp.: 230 °C
Analyzer Type: Quadrupole
Source Temp.: 230 °C
Quad Temp.: 150 °C
Electron Energy: 70 eV
Solvent Delay Time: 1.5 min.
Tune Type: BFB
Ionization Mode: EI
Scan Range: 36-260 amu
Instrument Agilent 7890A GC & 5975C MSD
Notes Other Purge and Trap Conditions:
Sample Inlet: 40°C
Sample: 40°C
Water Management: Purge 110°C, Desorb 0°C, Bake, 240°C

GC_EV1175

Conclusion

Labs interested in optimizing resolution and sample throughput can adopt the conditions established here on Rxi®-624Sil MS columns to maximize productivity and assure accurate, reliable results.